Ruff v. Parex, Inc.General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, New Hanover County, North Carolina Case No. 96-CVS-0059 (a class action on behalf of North Carolina residents for defective synthetic stucco siding resulting in a multi-million dollar settlement against Dryvit, Parex, Sto and several other manufacturers).
Thank you for visiting our website. The information contained herein presents general information about the firm and its lawyers and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Before acting on any of the information presented here, you should seek legal counsel.
We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters, and electronic mail. Please realize, however, that merely contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please therefore refrain from sending any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.
If you are interested in having our firm represent you in a legal matter, the best way to initiate possible representation is to speak with one of our attorneys.
Hiring a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon written information contained on this site concerning the qualifications and experience of the firm and its attorneys.
The following language is required by Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct: "These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers."
