Baldwin Mut. Ins. Co. v. McCain, [Ms. 1131058, Feb. 20, 2015] __ So. 3d __ (Ala. 2015). The circuit court held a hearing on plaintiff's motion to certify a class. The defendant filed its brief opposing the class certification motion the morning of the hearing, so the court gave the plaintiff thirty days to file a brief in response. In that brief, plaintiff used an amended definition of the proposed class. The circuit court certified that class. The Supreme Court reverses, holding that, because the circuit court did not hold a hearing after the amendment of the definition of the proposed class, the circuit court did not properly follow the requirements of ¤ 6-5-641, Ala. Code 1975. The Court reverses the order certifying the class and remands for further proceedings.

Related Documents: baldwin_mut_v_mccain_22015


Contact Us Today

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.